No sewing for me this week, but I have another finished quilt to share. It seems these last few weeks were the weeks to give quilts away!
A few months ago (maybe February?), the hubby asked me to make a baby quilt for a coworker. This is their first and, if I remember correctly, it's been a long time coming.
So of course I agreed. (It seems the only quilts I even start any more have a deadline, which is okay.)
I searched for a pattern...with the help of the hubby (who is not always great in the "imagine it in other colors" creativity) and we came up with this single block that can be purchased as an entire pattern on the designers website here.
I think he liked the bright colors and since the baby is a boy, the soft, girly colors of the original weren't exactly going to be right.
(It's interesting how the color placement really changes the look of the quilt - this reminds me of roads you'd drive your Hot Wheels cars along whereas the original has a more color gradient thing going.)
Anyways, it was then off to get fabrics, as I didn't think my stash had enough and who is going to refuse a chance to go fabric shopping?
I don't have any photos of that. I maybe took them, but I'm not sure where they went.
I took the fabrics to retreat in April and sewed this right up.
I don't think I even took during construction photos. I did take this to send the hubby for final approval. (I'm not changing anything at this point, but if he really hated it, we had time to make something else. He liked it.)
It sat around for a little while, but by this time he had realized the due date was not May but October. (Boys...)
This was the first quilt onto the longarm after the service visit and I opted for swirls (because they're easy to stop and start if I have trouble and go fast and will help me relearn some of the good habits I'd forgotten when dealing with a temperamental machine).
A back?
I was hoping for something with more primary colors to match the front, but woodland animals is never a bad choice for a baby quilt.
And a little closer on the quilting, though swirls are swirls.
The quilt went with the hubby last week to be given, but I haven't heard anything back. The hubby is working off shifts these next few weeks (to make sure his second and third shift employees see him and he sees them - he's been in that position when management doesn't even bother to try and then complains that you don't do anything - how do you know?!), so I expect when things return to normal he'll see Cody again and get to chat.
On a sadder note, Charlie passed away last week. I'm glad I got the quilt to him when I did and I hope someone in the family snags it to enjoy and remember him by.
I've been reading a lot, as always, but only finished one book this past week.
This one was pretty good, but disturbing also.
A husband and wife run a travelling circus. They expose her to all sorts of things in an attempt to create deformed children to add to their show. The husband does the research, the wife willingly submits. They succeed (sometimes) and love their children, but it seems like a fairly dysfunctional family.
The eldest, a limbless boy, is insecure and wants all of the attention. He also gradually takes control of the circus, though it seems most of the family don't see it. The youngest girl, an albino dwarf, cares for this brother in the ways he cannot and loves him, puts up with his behaviors, but also sees what he is doing.
There is also a pair of conjoined twin girls and a telekinetic boy (who looks normal and was almost abandoned for that).
The story is told by the albino dwarf daughter, both her current life (post-circus) and her past (growing up in the circus). I expected there to be some romantic interludes, considering the title, but I think it more refers to the love found in even dysfunctional families, in this case where they stick together because of their differences.
I knew from the blurb that "geek" did not refer to the nerdy folks as the slang does today, but the carnival meaning also did not feature as much as you might expect once you sort that out. (Yes, they were there. But they were mentioned maybe twice, in passing.)
It was hard to see the way the eldest brother treated people and it was not only not noticed by the parents, but also no one tried to help him. It was hard to see the parents more focused on creating additional children rather than caring for the ones they had (though there were some moments of good). It was hard to read about the children being exploited for their differences. Sadly, I'm pretty sure that this type of thing was more normal than not back in the time when these sorts of shows were common.
But it was also an interesting peek into a world I'm too young to have really experienced. Much of what was going on here was gone or on its way out when I was young and I don't remember visiting anything like this as a child.
I'm on to the next book, of course, and this one is a mammoth. More on that next week!
Happy quilting and reading,
Katie